Those concerns were addressed by examining site-specific data for the Umatilla Depot Activity and by recommending the scope and content of a more detailed site-specific study. The Phase I report addressed new and additional concerns not incorporated in the final programmatic environmental impact statement (FPEIS). Sponsoring Org.: USDOD OSTI Identifier: 6163293 Report Number(s): ANL/EAIS/TM-34 ON: DE91002990 DOE Contract Number: W-31109-ENG-38 Resource Type: Technical Report Country of Publication: United States Language: English Subject: 45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEFENSE 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS WASTE DISPOSAL ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS METEOROLOGY MILITARY FACILITIES SITE CHARACTERIZATION SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS STOCKPILES DOCUMENT TYPES FEDERAL REGION VI INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS MANAGEMENT NORTH AMERICA USA WASTE MANAGEMENT WEAPONS 450600* - Military Technology, Weaponry, & National Defense- Chemical & Biological- (1990) 540250 - Environment, Terrestrial- Site Resource & Use Studies- = ,Īs part of the Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program mandated by Public Law 99-145 (Department of Defense Authorization Act), an independent review is presented of the US Army Phase I environmental report for the disposal program at the Umatilla Depot Activity (UMDA) in Hermiston, Oregon. Environmental Assessment and Information Sciences Div. « lessĪuthors: Krummel, J R Policastro, A J Olshansky, S J McGinnis, L D Publication Date: Mon Oct 01 00:00: Research Org.: Argonne National Lab., IL (USA). It is recommended that alternative assumptions about meteorological conditions be considered and that site-specific data on water, ecological, socioeconomic, and cultural resources, and emergency planning and preparedness be considered explicitly in more » the site-specific EIS decision-making process. Based on the methods and assumptions presented in the FPEIS, the inclusion of more detailed site-specific data in the Phase I report does not change the decision reached in the FPEIS (which favored on-site disposal at PBA). This dependent review evaluates whether the new site-specific data presented in the Phase I report would alter the decision in favor of on-site disposal that was reached in the FPEIS, and whether the recommendations for the scope and content of the site-specific study are adequate. Those concerns were addressed by examining site-specific data for the PBA and by recommending the scope and content of a more detailed site- specific study.

As part of the Chemical Stockpile Disposal Program mandated by Public Law 99-145 (Department of Defense Authorization Act), an independent review is presented of the US Army Phase I environmental report for the disposal program at the Pine Bluff Arsenal (PBA) in Arkansas.

Idocument 2 review